What features in particular would you like to lose from the MZ-S, and why?
Presumably what you mean is 'the build of MZ-S but for less money'? > -----Original Message----- > From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 06 December 2001 15:38 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Pentax > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Pentax > > > > Sorry for this OT post, but I really like Pentax cameras, > lenses, etc, and > > have taken some great pix over the years with them. I wonder > if anyone else > > shares my pov. > > I am not so hot on the recent camera bodies, I detested the PZ > series, but I do quite like the numbered MZ series. The build > quality leaves a bit to be desired. They are not especially > rugged. I do wish they would put a camera out there with the > build of the MZ-S but with a feature set more like the MZ-3. > For me, Pentax has always been about the lenses anyway. I have > one K series lens, and wish I had a few more. The one I have is > wonderful. The few M lenses I own have some nice > characteristics. Even the maligned 28mm f2.8 is not a bad lens. > It is just not as good as the other 28s that Pentax has made. I > have made a couple of fine pictures with mine. > The A series lenses are optically very nice, but the build > quality is spotty. Some are much better than others. > With the LTD series, I think Pentax has hit it's stride again. > These lenses are absolutely the best they can be. > Now, give me a camera body to match, and I am happy. > The rumoured LX replacement sounds just like what I am hoping > for. > William Robb > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
