Joseph McAllister wrote:
On Oct 12, 2008, at 12:26 , Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps it's not OT regarding photography, but there's no Pentax content:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/thank_you_for_smoking.html
http://tinyurl.com/4qun6c
I hate revisionist history, even if old practices are now officially
frowned
upon. If the picture was no good in its original form then they
shouldn't
have used it at all.
Different background, different angle on guitar neck, different chord
fingering on the guitar, shirt open at the top, not closed. Possible in
Photoshop, but that's a lot to do, even for a stamp. Maybe the guy moved
for the photographer to a different place nearby and put down the butt.
Just as plausible.
Wow! I hadn't even noticed all that. The Robert Johnson photos are
clearly different shots!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
