On Oct 12, 2008, at 12:26 , Anthony Farr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps it's not OT regarding photography, but there's no Pentax
content:
http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2008/10/thank_you_for_smoking.html
http://tinyurl.com/4qun6c
I hate revisionist history, even if old practices are now officially
frowned
upon. If the picture was no good in its original form then they
shouldn't
have used it at all.
regards, Anthony Farr
Different background, different angle on guitar neck, different chord
fingering on the guitar, shirt open at the top, not closed. Possible
in Photoshop, but that's a lot to do, even for a stamp. Maybe the guy
moved for the photographer to a different place nearby and put down
the butt. Just as plausible.
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
