I went back and looked at the whole set in that first edit.
For what it is worth, I would still end with #7 from the reduced set.
Number 8 and 9 I would delete. In their place I would use 9299-213 in
position #7 and A039901 in #8 position.
Oh, and I would choose -171 vs. -174 for the second position.
The two others that really caught my eye were 9299-132 and -142.
Back in the day, when I would occasionally do slide shows (as in,
light shining through transparency film, focused by a lens onto a
white screen) for climbing clubs, cycling clubs, church groups,
family and/or friends, I would vary the pace considerably from image
to image and section to section. Some shots deserve examination,
maybe discussion. Others are better placed in a linear virtual
montage (i.e., 1.0-1.5 secs per image). As I have been working on
book layouts, I find that I have been varying the "pace" through
sizing and positioning the images. As I understand what you are
doing, with a metronomic delivery of images, it is much more
challenging as each image needs to stand on its own as well as
fitting in with the whole.
stan
On Oct 15, 2008, at 7:27 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
Not sure I understand the criteria for success in this context, but
among these 9 images, I think the "strongest" and the one I would
end a mini-show with is #7. The bright yellow is a nice exclamation
point behind what has been mostly muted colors.
stan
On Oct 15, 2008, at 5:41 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Very nice Bob.
As Frank said, i don't envy the thought of editing those to 8-9
photos.
Dave
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A couple of days ago I posted a first edit of the tanneries in Fez:
http://www.web-options.com/Tanneries/
For the ARPS submission I need an essay of exactly 15 pictures. I
have
decided that I will probably make 2 mini-essays, presented as a
slideshow, one of which will be about the tanneries - 6-8 pictures.
Here is my 2nd edit of the tanneries section, done as a Flash
gallery
so you can see approximately how the slideshow will work:
http://www.web-options.com/RPSTanneries/
I'd welcome your thoughts about the content, sequencing and so
on. It
will need to lose some pictures, but I will take part in an RPS
workshop later this month where I will discuss what is strongest -
your views are important to me though (I sound like a call centre!).
My main feeling about this one is that it really needs a stronger
clincher to close the set.
Fire away!
Thanks,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
