Snipped from a post on this very list 4 days ago, "Just got off the phone with Pentax USA and they do not have an answer. But they are reading this forum, and in fact were reading my last post re: EXIF when the phone tech called them up with this problem. So our whines are heard. Good to know. (Hi guys!)"
Pay attention, guys :-) Regards, Anthony > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Jaume Lahuerta > Sent: Tuesday, 21 October 2008 11:41 PM > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: What do you all think of the micro 4/3 system? > > And, if they were once, it was many years ago, when people here was worried > about what their brand offered form a technical point of view. > Now or they don't care much and/or just use other brands that better suit their > needs. > > Hey, does this mean that this list has reached a certain level of maturity? > ;-) > > > > ----- Mensaje original ---- > De: John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Para: pdml@pdml.net > Enviado: martes, 21 de octubre, 2008 13:52:32 > Asunto: Re: What do you all think of the micro 4/3 system? > > From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I imagine threads like this on the PDML are making Pentax a little worried. > > I imagine threads on the PDML are barely noticeable to Pentax. > > -- -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
