On Oct 21, 2008, at 06:03 , John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: "John Celio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I imagine threads like this on the PDML are making Pentax a little
worried.
I imagine threads on the PDML are barely noticeable to Pentax.
They are probably "barely" noticeable when it comes to design and R&D
suggestions, as those departments are several years ahead of consumer
product introductions. But as my post regarding EXIF problems in
Aperture from several days ago suggests, someone in PentaxImaging here
in the US is keeping up with PDML and other sites and passing data
gained up the line to HQ in Japan. I suppose most if not all
manufacturers of products that support online forums are doing the
same. It's much less expensive than "focus groups".
Just got off the phone with Pentax USA and they do not have an
answer. But they are reading this forum, and in fact were reading my
last post re: EXIF when the phone tech called them up with this
problem. So our whines are heard. Good to know. (Hi guys!)
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
