"aimcompute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >That is truly amazing. I wonder what is up with Kodak? > >1. Do they want to unload the scanners that bad? >2. Are they having problems selling the scanners? >3. Do they want to get rid of the film that bad? > >100 X $6.00 a roll. That's 2/3 the price of the scanner itself. Makes one >wonder... if they just wanted to unload scanners they could just drop the >price and keep the film. > >Very Odd IMO.
I agree. I'm guessing that they've realized that the scanner is overpriced compared to the competition, but I can't imagine why they're doing this instead of just reducing the price. Here's their offer: http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/scanners/rfs3600/offer.jhtml >Mark Roberts wrote: > ><snip> > >> >> It's kind of overpriced in the current market (around $900.00 I think) >because >> it doesn't have the digital ICE dust & scratch removal and it's >construction is >> decidedly flimsy. On the plus side, it comes with 10 36-exposure rolls of >Kodak >> Supra 400 and until Jan 31, it comes with a coupon for 100 free rolls of >Kodak >> professional film. Yep, 100 rolls. That brings the effective price down by >a >> lot! (I expect when the rebate offer runs out they'll lower the price of >the >> scanner to a more reasonable level.) >- >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . -- Mark Roberts www.robertstech.com - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
