Well, it may be a bit soft but it's an image I'd be proud of. Mother(?) and chick! Great stuff!
Cheers Brian ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/ On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 22:34 -0400, "John Sessoms" <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > I've been looking for the owl I heard earlier this month, trying to get > some idea of its habits. Yesterday, I spotted it on the nest I thought > it might use, and came back today with my camera: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/jb_sessoms/3396685627/ > > K10D, Sigma 300 2.8 + Sigma APO 1.4x tele-converter, on a tripod ... > ISO 400 (I think) > > The image is a bit soft. I've noticed that whenever I use the 1.4x > converter, even though it's supposed to be matched to the lens. > > It just kills me. Some guy came along with a Nikon D200 & 200 mm Nikon > IS lens and chimping what he got looked a whole lot sharper than what I > got. > > But ... it's what I got. > > -- -- -- http://www.fastmail.fm - IMAP accessible web-mail -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
