Both of which are "normal" on an APS C sized sensor, 35mm being ~
50/55mm the longish normal we're used to with 35mm film cameras. 28mm
being approximatly the diagonal of the sensor, making it a true normal
as defined my most other photographic formats.
On 1/5/2010 4:46 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
fwiw, both the k35/3.5 and k28/3.5 are truly excellent lenses on
digital.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER& DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
-----Original Message-----
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Godfrey DiGiorgi
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 4:37 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Wide angle for K-X?
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Martin Trautmann<tr...@gmx.de> wrote:
For wide angles which are the topic here?
I'm more concerned by the max. opening which does provide good
quality. I do prefer a f/2.8 which becomes excellent at f/4.0 to a
brighter f/1.8 which sucks up to f/5.6.
Most of the best wide-angle lenses made are relatively slow lenses, f/4
is fast for an ultrawide.
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
