On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: > Look closely, he just used a big flash in the photo without star trails. :-) > Regards, Bob S. > I don't think he used a flash or any artificial light. The light extends too far into the background, and it's too uniform. However, it could be a combination of two exposures. One shot before the ball dropped, the other after dark. Paul > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Mark Roberts <m...@robertstech.com> wrote: >> Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax >> forum a few weeks back regarding the Pentax Photo Gallery. Two photos >> from the same photographer: >> >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=2245441&subSubSection=3826178&language=EN >> EXIF says the exposure time was 31 min and 29 sec and it certainly >> looks that way from the star trails. >> >> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=2245441&subSubSection=3190723&language=EN >> EXIF indicates an exposure time of 16 min and 38 sec, half the time of >> the first shot but the star trails aren't half as long, they're >> non-existent! Also, there's no dimming or diffusion of the stars close >> to the horizon from passing through more atmosphere and low-level >> airborne dust like the first photo: The stars are clear and bright all >> the way down to the horizon. Almost as if the sky was pasted in from >> another photo... >> >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> PDML@pdml.net >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. >> > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions.
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
