ann sanfedele wrote: >Mark - um I think the links are reversed :-)
Looks that way. But I'm sure everyone here is smart enough to figure it out anyway. >Mark Roberts wrote: > >>Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax >>forum a few weeks back regarding the Pentax Photo Gallery. Two photos >>from the same photographer: >> >>http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=2245441&subSubSection=3826178&language=EN >>EXIF says the exposure time was 31 min and 29 sec and it certainly >>looks that way from the star trails. >> >>http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=2245441&subSubSection=3190723&language=EN >>EXIF indicates an exposure time of 16 min and 38 sec, half the time of >>the first shot but the star trails aren't half as long, they're >>non-existent! Also, there's no dimming or diffusion of the stars close >>to the horizon from passing through more atmosphere and low-level >>airborne dust like the first photo: The stars are clear and bright all >>the way down to the horizon. Almost as if the sky was pasted in from >>another photo... >> >> >> >> -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
