It's not paranoid. I never expect a transaction to go south. This is an interesting insight into how B&H apparently chooses to handle things in the case of a misunderstanding, one that they inadvertently caused.
We each have the right to our own opinions, and I'm not alone in the one I hold. Tom C. On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Mark Roberts <m...@robertstech.com> wrote: > P N Stenquist wrote: > >>On Feb 1, 2010, at 8:55 AM, Tom C wrote: >> >>> Not their record on this. >> >>"On this" is key here. > > Precisely. > >>It's one case out of perhaps millions. > > Not "perhaps" millions, *definitely* millions. Obsessing on this > single case in the face of overwhelmingly positive experiences is > simply paranoid. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
