> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom C <caka...@gmail.com>
> Then, respectfully, please inform us regarding the rest of
> the story and details we're unaware of.  Then we'll also have
> complete information and can reach a fair conclusion, which
> you imply we have not.

Actually I was emailing replies all along. Unfortunately for me I'd registered 
here under hen...@bhphotovideo.com and learned only this morning that our 
back-end people had changed me to hen...@bhphoto.com so every message I'd sent 
here bounced. Since the topic has died down I don't think tossing gas on dieing 
embers is particularly fruitful. The product in question was not a Pentax 
product and the customer in question is, as far as I can tell, not a subscriber 
to this group.

I am reluctant to go too far OT, but briefly we sell a particular speaker for 
250.00 each. We inadvertently posted on our site the speaker was selling for 
250.00/pair. The customer placed an order which was transmitted to the 
warehouse where they were unaware of the site error and shipped the customer a 
speaker. He contacted us and we offered a variety of reasonable compromises 
including the chance to buy the 2nd speaker for our cost with free shipping. 
Lawyers I know say a compromise is when both parties are equally dissatisfied. 
We were unable to reach a compromise with the customer. We regret the error and 
regret not being able to come to a compromise.

Someone speculated about the original review disappearing from the site. The 
author of the review revised it. That sent it from active to pending status. 
Once the pending period expired the review returned to visibility. B&H had 
nothing to do wit that.

Regarding legalities, our site and our site's disclaimer and our response to 
this situation have all been vetted by our in-house lawyer. We are confident of 
the legality. I believe my first post, forwarded by another member of this 
group, referenced The Equitable Doctrine of Unilateral Mistake. It is germane.

On a personal note, one person here posted the following at various times:
"Posner's whine ...Posner's just the waterboy for them...B&H lied about their 
pricing...So, we now have B&H Photo who come off looking like a bunch of lying 
scumbags...attack dog Posner..."

I'd like to think it's possible to engage in a reasonable dialogue here and 
disagree with one another without resorting to venal personal invective and 
insults.

 -- -

 regards,
 Henry Posner
 B&H Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to