On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > I was lucky enough to get the Sigma 400 for US$500 right after it was > discontinued maybe five years ago. I haven't researched their used prices. > Though I'd love to have the FA 400/5.6 or, better yet, the FA* 400/2.8 (or > F*?), I can't justify the cost for the amount I'd use it. I'd like to have > the FA* 300/2.8, but the same logic applies.
I don't think Pentax made a 400/2.8 with AF. I don't think I'd want one due to the weight and super narrow DOF. I really must use my FA400/5.6 more (same goes for all of my lenses, really). I wouldn't mind an 80-200 f/2.8 myself. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
