The public has every right to know, but the current administration
doesn't think so. Those with standing to sue, the press, are in the
pocket of this Administration so don't expect lawsuits or even much in
the way of complaints anytime soon.
On 7/6/2010 9:07 AM, eckinator wrote:
2010/7/6 Brian Walters<supera1...@fastmail.fm>:
Just this afternoon I wanted to take a few photos at the local railway
station. I had no sooner lifted the camera to my eye when the station
attendant appeared saying "You can't take photos here". I didn't push
it because I was on railway property and maybe she was within her
rights, but it's getting to the stage where people think that anyone
carrying a 'real' camera is a terrorist or a child molester.
OK over to another topic, why is the work of journalists covering the
BP spill obstructed in such a way? Doesn't the public have a right to
know? They can't be claiming it is to prevent al Quaeda from preparing
to steal all that oil, can they? What sorry excuse for a blatant lie
is there now?
Ecke
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
