On 3 September 2010 12:29, Rick Womer <rwomer1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Aw, c'mon, guys; this is getting rather harsh.
>
> The K10D has sluggish autofocus, yes.  That didn't prevent many of us from 
> taking lots of good action shots with it, though (not to mention with manual 
> focus cameras not so long ago!). A couple of list members have posted great 
> shots of auto and motorcycle races taken with the K10D.  One just has to know 
> the camera's limitations and deal with them, such as by pre-focusing on an 
> area and snapping when the subject enters it.
>
> Charles and Mis, you've both posted beautiful photos taken with your K10Ds, 
> and I doubt you were constantly swearing at your cameras while you took them.
>
> The K10D remains a rugged, well-laid-out, versatile camera with an excellent 
> sensor for its time.  I would not hesitate to sell mine to anyone, if I 
> weren't using it as my backup body.
>
> Rick

Rick,

It's not *me* being harsh about the K10D's AF. My philosophy for
dealing with the AF is similar to my high ISO philosophy: If you learn
to work with what you've got you'll get much better results than not
shooting and bitching about it. I would never defend the K10D's
amazing AF capabilities, but I used AF most of the time and achieved
what I wanted. Sometimes I employed tricks, other times I could use it
as-is, but I always knew when to use which. Clearly the K10D has
worked well enough for me that I never upgraded to either the K20D or
K-7.

What I *have* complained about is the lack of firmware upgrades. And I
will continue to do so.


  --M.
-- 

    \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com

    http://EnticingTheLight.com
    A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to