At least there aren't combination that can cause actual damage, (if you stay away from KR lenses and Pentax didn't actually make any of those). Nikon on the has those...

On 11/2/2010 1:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Personally, I think that Pentax backward compatibility is way overrated compared to what it truly is.

On 11/1/2010 11:41 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Miserere wrote:

Boris, I'd say yes and no. I suppose we should take into account what
*might* happen 5 years from now, but what's more important to me is
what happens this Friday when I go shooting. If I need a DA lens for
my subjects, then I'll buy it and use it; it would seem silly to me
not to do so just because *maybe* in 5 years time that lens will
become unusable on the new bodies.

Personally, I don't think there's any chance that Pentax (top-end
bodies, anyway) will lose screw-drive in 5 years. There's a
significant number of FA* lenses like the 600/4.0, 250-600/5.6 and
300/2.8 out there. Not a lot, but a significant number. And their
owners are long-time, money-spending Pentax users who Pentax is
unlikely to want to piss off. Also, there are no SDM replacements for
these lenses in sight at the moment.

I think this is all hand-wringing over nothing.





--
"His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral 
bankruptcy."
     -Woody Allen


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to