Well, I can't argue the point, as I'm not well versed in these things, but that doesn't stop me from having an informed opinion, which is that you're wrong.
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote: > > 4000ppi is probably better than 35mm can do because > the lenses w/ film rarely if ever achive more than 100 lines/mm > which would be more like a 2400x3600 pixel image which > is only about 8.5 Mpixel. -- Shel Belinkoff mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
