100 lines per millimetre is 25.4 x 100 is 2540 lines per inch. Is it OK to say that this could be translated to 2540 ppi, or do I miss something here?
Frits Wüthrich > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shel Belinkoff > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 12:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Am I Really a Dinosaur? > > > Close only counts in horse shoes ... please explain why 4000ppi is the > of resolution. > > William Robb wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Shel Belinkoff" > > Subject: Re: Am I Really a Dinosaur? > > > > > Well, I can't argue the point, as I'm not well versed in these > > things, > > > but that doesn't stop me from having an informed opinion, > > which is that > > > you're wrong. > > > > Actually, he is pretty close to being right. > > > > William Robb > > > > > > "J. C. O'Connell" wrote: > > > > > > > > 4000ppi is probably better than 35mm can do because > > > > the lenses w/ film rarely if ever achive more than 100 > > lines/mm > > > > which would be more like a 2400x3600 pixel image which > > > > is only about 8.5 Mpixel. > > - > > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > > -- > Shel Belinkoff > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://home.earthlink.net/~belinkoff/ > You can't have everything. Where would you put it? > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
