> > Er, London is a city too. Do you really believe that because some > cyclists break the law all cyclists should be forced into unsafe > behaviour? How about if all motorists were forced into unsafe behaviour > because some of them break the law? > > Bingo! > > It's really easy to pick on cyclists - we're slower moving (compared > to cars), we aren't enclosed in a steel and glass cage - we're easy > targets. > [...] > killed by automobiles. If we're going to "crack down" on bad road > manners, who should we go after, cars or bikes? Yes, I know, the > answer is "both", but please, don't target us before cars. > > cheers, > frank
also worth pointing out that if the aim of bringing in a new law is to curb the people who are already breaking existing laws, it ain't gunna work - they'll ignore that one too. What works is investigating the way traffic - all traffic - operates, and redesigning the streets to improve it for everyone. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
