John, Somebody at Pentax owes us some long, fast glass. The diversion of resources to a toy camera is annoying! Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:18 PM, John Celio <n...@neovenator.com> wrote: > I'm amazed by how many people are expressing disappointment in the Q, > here and on other forums, as if it's supposed to be some sort of > professional camera system. > > Guys, this is a modern Auto110. It's made for moderately versatile > convenience, and it's aimed at people who want to have fun with their > cameras. Those of us who lug around our K-whatevers every day are not > the intended market! > > Please, take a chill pill and quit acting like Pentax owes you a better > camera. They already make better cameras, and you probably already own > one of them. Pentax may very well come out with a larger mirrorless > camera this year, but I'd be willing to bet you'll find some reason to > bitch about it anyway. > > John > > P.S.: For what it's worth, I think the Q is pretty damn intriguing. As > an Auto110 fan, I like this addition to Pentax's digital lineup. > > -- > http://www.jacelio.com > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
