On top of which, photo.net is butt-ugly to look at these days. I pay the $25 to flickr for ad-free photo-sharing with family & friends. For the stuff I care about, I host on my own blog. But to make it work the way I like it, I had to write a whole bunch of software, so I can't in good conscience recommend that approach.
-T On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Bob W <p...@web-options.com> wrote: >> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of >> Mark Roberts > >> >> Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> >Photo.net members don't see the ads. >> >> Apparently, non-members who visit photo.net with JavaScript turned off >> (use Firefox with the NoScript plug-in) don't see ads either. >> > > well, like it or not Javascript, and other forms of client-side processing, > is essential to producing some of the good bits of the web, so disabling it > just to get rid of intrusive ads is throwing the baby out with the bath > water. > > The way to stop this sort of crap is to refuse to visit the sites which are > pushing it, and let them know. Hit them where it hurts. > > B > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
