On Nov 27, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote: > On Sunday, November 27, 2011 1:22 PM, "Larry Colen" <l...@red4est.com> > wrote: >> >> On Nov 27, 2011, at 1:19 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: >> >>> AFAIK the PUG has never had any official connection to Pentax, it's always >>> been a function of the members of the group. The List was once a function >>> of Pentax but is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Brewer Productions. >>> >> >> Ah, OK. So, that still leaves open the question, what is the purpose >> of the PUG? Who is the intended audience? > > > As far as I know, the intended audience is us, but that doesn't mean > that it can't be shared more widely. > > The PUG started in pre-digital days when the ability to share photos > online wasn't as trivial as it is now and, to some extent, the > widespread uses of PESOs and GESOs has taken over part of its role. But > a themed gallery combining the talents of members is still a nice > feature of the list, IMO. > > > Cheers > > Brian >
Great minds think alike. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
