On 19/12/11, Dario Bonazza, discombobulated, unleashed: >Main improvement suggested: get rid of that optical viewfinder and replace >it with a good EVF a la Panasonic.
That would kill it for me Dario. The best EVF in the world is still a bucket of horse turds compare to optical for me. And in case you'd like to see the EVF i use every day, this is it: <http://www.creativevideo.co.uk/index.php?t=product/sony_dxf-20w> One thing I don't understand is: >Cons: >- Viewfinder frames what it wants and not what you want (due to 75% coverage >and parallax), >- Viewfinder gives you no info (neither exposure data nor focus point), Where does this originate? It sounds to me like people are taking this on without ever having used a rangefinder camera - hence not understanding parallax error. And not wanting to be pedantic, but I understand it's 85% coverage. The fact there is no information in the optical viewfinder is of no consequence to me. I plan to use it in either fully manual by zone focus, or fully automatic while pissed at parties. The highlights don't bother me - - yet. I'm buying the camera for fun and easy use - if I wanted quality I'd get a 1Dx or maybe even a K-5 ;-) <http://www.dpreview.com/articles/4333175133/buyers-guide-enthusiast-raw- shooting-compact-cameras/3> -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com _____________________________ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
