On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:23 PM, Stanley Halpin
<s...@stans-photography.info> wrote:
>
> On Oct 6, 2014, at 4:26 PM, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote:
>>
>> P.J. Alling wrote:
>>> and wonder of wonders it's got some interesting information for free.
>>>
>>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/techniques/pentax_645z_astrophotography.shtml
>>
>> Excellent link, though I'm afraid that if I were to spend $10K on a 645Z, I 
>> wouldn't have any money left over for the $500 astro mount.
>>
>> I was surprised to find that there don't seem any lenses faster than f/2.8 
>> available for the 645.  Doing some quick web search, there don't even seem 
>> to be any manual focus lenses faster than f/2.8 available.
>>
>
> There are adapters that support the use of Hassleblad etc. on the 645. Maybe 
> you can find the faster glass you need by going that route?

I always assumed that there isn't faster glass because there doesn't
need to be. The DoF on medium format is already razor thin compared to
35mm and APS-C and perhaps a 1.4 on a 645z would create a serious
focusing problem? Or ridiculously OOF portraits?

In other words, we have what's practical to sell, as with other
formats. Or am I way off base?

-- 
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to