The takumar bayonet lenses were cheap consumer grade k-mount lenses. not worth $100 at all. There are better performing lenses available for less.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 05:45:18PM -0400, J. Gerace wrote: > hmmmm....can you explain why? > > Nitin Garg wrote: > > >If its the pentax takumar bayonet lens then its very bad. > >If its the pentax takumar screwmount lens then its expensive tho not > >bad. > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 03:57:17PM -0400, J. Gerace wrote: > > > >>O.K. - you're starting to scare me.....: ) I just 'won' a Pentax > >>Takumar 135 2.5 lens on e-bay for $100. Is this bad? > >> > >>Julia > >> > >>James Adams wrote: > >> > >>>Peter wrote.... > >>>Well, I am shooting on the 135mm F2.5 Takumar at present. > >>> > >>>Although I have both the Super Tak 135mm f3.5 and SMC Tak 135mm f3.5 lenses, > >>>I have tended to use my SMC Takumar 105mm f2.8 for Portraits. > >>> > >>>Now that I'm starting B&W again, I might experiment with 135mm lenses. > >>>James > >>>- > >>>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > >>>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > >>>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > >>> > >>- > >>This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > >>go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > >>visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > >> > >- > >This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > >go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > >visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . > - > This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, > go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to > visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
