I'm sure I've asked this before and had it explained to me, but can
someone give me a rationale for why Pentax got rid of the aperture
simulator, and perhaps why they don't bring it back since so many Pentax
users want it? I gather that it would make Pentax DSLRs even more
backwards compatible with Pentax's legendary glass?
I don't really have an opinion either way regarding the aperture
simulator since the few 'M' lenses I do have work quite happily with my
K1000 & LX.
On 2/23/2016 11:16 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
It has no aperture simulator so it supports them the same way every
Pentax DSLR since the *ist-D has.
On 2/23/2016 9:32 PM, mail1 wrote:
The question is will the K-1 support non KA M lenses?
Jonathan
-----Original Message-----
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of DagT
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2016 12:33 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: pentax/tokina 24-70/2.8
I´ve tried it on K-3 and at least in that format it is great. «Kenspo»
on Pentaxforums is almost a neighbour and he loves it for rock
conserts and models. Very good flare control and sharpness. We will
see soon if it is works on K-1 he claims to be the first to get one
(or two).
DagT
19. feb. 2016 kl. 20.18 skrev Paul Stenquist <pnstenqu...@mac.com>:
What’s the consensus on this lens? That’s a focal length I’m going to
need, but i haven’t read much about it.
Paul
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
