I hear the "Back to CP/M" movement has been gaining a lot of ground recently.
Pip! Pip! B > On 29 Jul 2016, at 18:59, John <sesso...@earthlink.net> wrote: > > Well, an update of sorts ... > > Following some of the information I found on the internet, I did a scan > for broken drivers. It returned a log file of all the things it "fixed". > > Reading through the log file I couldn't make hide nor hair of what it > had done, but I noticed the log file also contained all the errors from > the failed Windoze 10 installation attempt & I noticed something > peculiar. All of the errors were from packages that failed to open & all > the packages that did fail were for an AMD x64 processor. > > I found that kind of interesting because the system CPU is a quad core > Intel i7. > > ??? > > I'll give it one more go, but if it doesn't install in time to qualify > for the "free upgrade", fageddaboutit! > >> On 7/29/2016 12:41 PM, John Francis wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 07:59:03AM +1000, Brian Walters wrote: >>> Hmm - it's tales like this that make me glad I resisted the temptation >>> to upgrade from Win7. It works; it does what I want; I'm leaving well >>> enough alone... >>> >>> Also my PC is so low spec that I'm almost certain I'd run into worse >>> problems than you have. >> >> I've upgraded three machines; the lowest-spec one was an older HP laptop >> with dual celeron processors. That one took over 12 hours to run through >> the installation process, but it eventually got there. >> >> My only problems have been with the network; sometimes when one machine >> boots up it can't connect to my wireless network. I still haven't found >> out the best incantation to fix this problem, but so far I've have always >> been able to connect eventually. > > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
