Sorry Ed for my error and thank you, Bruce, for correcting it. I didn't
realise the difference between servo focus and predictive focus, and still
not fully, so the clarify this issue: is servo focus about the same as
Nikon's continuous focus?

And know I've become curious also, how much faster and convenient the MZ-S's
advanced 6-area focus truly is? And what about difference in metering? Caus'
I use a MZ-5 and think about grabbing a MZ-3 because of the extra features,
but if the MZ-S is really that big a jump ahead, it would possibly be worth
the extra bucks :)

Rod.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 18:58
Subject: Re: Need advice for buying MZ-S or MZ-3


> Action? the mz-3 has predictive focus, when set to
> multi frame advance it will continue to focus if the
> subject is moving across the sensor once it locked on
> but stops after the shot.
>
> --- Michael Cross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Actually the MZ-3 does have servo focus.  However,
> > it is only available in the
> > "action" auto picture mode.  Switch the main dial to
> > "action" and you are
> > automatically in servo mode.
> >
> > Bruce Dayton wrote:
> >
> > > Ronald,
> > >
> > > There is a big difference in price between these
> > two models.  Also,
> > > there is a big difference in build quality and
> > some features.  On the
> > > AF front, the MZ-S has 6 selectable sensors and
> > has the most advanced
> > > AF algorithms of any Pentax camera.  The MZ-3 has
> > only 3 sensors
> > > selectable between spot and wide area.  Also the
> > MZ-S has true servo
> > > based focus mode while the MZ-3 does not.  This
> > means that you can
> > > hold down the shutter button all the while panning
> > on your subject and
> > > the camera will continuously focus.  Just fire at
> > the desired moment.
> > > On the MZ-3 you will have to constantly
> > press/release the shutter
> > > button to achieve the same capability.
> > >
> > > Bruce
> > >
> > > Wednesday, September 4, 2002, 12:19:25 AM, you
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > RdL> I believe the MZ-3 to have the same
> > auto-focus system as the MZ5(n), which
> > > RdL> is quite fast IF there is enough light.
> > Metering of the MZ5/MZ3 is, in my
> > > RdL> opinion, excellent. MZ-S should be about the
> > same but then somewhat faster,
> > > RdL> and the metering is also more advanced. You
> > get what you pay for,
> > >
> > > RdL> Rod.
> > >
> > > RdL> ----- Original Message -----
> > > RdL> From: "mrlighthouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > RdL> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > RdL> Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2002 01:39
> > > RdL> Subject: Need advice for buying MZ-S or MZ-3
> > >
> > > >> Hi All,
> > > >>
> > > >> I have a PZ-1P which I like a lot except for
> > the autofocus which seems
> > > >> somewhat slow and not as accurate compared to
> > some of the newer cameras. I
> > > >> have been looking around for a new camera and
> > have come down to either the
> > > >> MZ-S or the MZ3. I know there is a big
> > difference in price between the two
> > > >> of them.
> > > >>
> > > >> I'm interested in how much difference there is
> > in the auto focus speed and
> > > >> accuracy of the MZ-S to the MZ3 and also the
> > Metering accuracy between the
> > > >> two of them. I shoot mostly landscapes and auto
> > racing so I'm kind of on
> > > RdL> the
> > > >> extreme ends. I would appreciate any input.
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Ed Wong
> > > >>
> >
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca


Reply via email to