It depends on your terms of employment.
At 11:20 AM 9/25/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>"Thanks for the positive reinforcement! I know a reporter for a local
>paper
>who for years used no other body than a K1000. Then, her bosses decided
>to
>retire their wet darkroom so she had to purchase a Digital!"
>
>Our staff photographer uses a Leica rangefinder (older than M6, I
>think) and Nikon F3's. The pressure got so intense on him to go digital
>that he is now using a borrowed E-20. Of course, no one wants to spend
>the money to get him an interchangeable lens DSLR. Even the E-20 is
>borrowed; they gave him a Coolpix 950. There is, of course, the
>scanner option, but they want photos for the Website immediately after
>the event, and digital is the best option for that.
>
>How do people feel about that? Is it reasonable to say "look, we only
>want web photos, so just use a P&S", or is the photographer entitled to
>use equipment sufficiently good for him to be comfortable with the level
>of control? I have some sympathy for both sides in this case.
>
>
>
>Steven Desjardins
>Department of Chemistry
>Washington and Lee University
>Lexington, VA 24450
>(540) 458-8873
>FAX: (540) 458-8878
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
