Christian,

To me, the MX was the ultimate camera to learn with - not the K1000. I
believe the other reason for the K1000 popularity was that it was
relatively inexpensive.  I would never want one myself - same as you -
missing too much viewfinder info.


Bruce



Tuesday, November 19, 2002, 12:41:15 PM, you wrote:

CS> I'm sure the K1000 is a good basic camera but why do many people think it's a 
CS> good "student" camera?

CS> From Boz's site:
CS> "This big, heavy, and fully mechanical body offers no automation of any kind. 
CS>  It offers only the most basic features: a light-tight box, a film advance, a 
CS> tripod socket, and a built-in light meter: all that one needs for learning 
CS> the basics of photography.  This total lack of convenience features explains 
CS> the cult status of the K1000 among photo students worldwide.  However, it 
CS> fails to explain its popularity with PDML members.  I mean, do you people not 
CS> miss viewfinder information on aperture and shutter speed, a self-timer, a 
CS> DOF preview lever or minimal flash automation?  Wouldn't a KX or a KM be a 
CS> better choice?"

CS> Why is it "good" for students to have a total lack of viewfinder information 
CS> (barring of course exposure info)?  Why does a student not need to know what 
CS> shutter speed he/she is shooting at without moving the camera from the eye to 
CS> look at the dial?  Why is it bad for a student to not be able to see what 
CS> aperture he/she is using so he/she can judge depth of field?

CS> When I was learning photography (I'm still learning but I have a full 
CS> understanding of exposure.  I'm always learning) all I had was a Ricoh KR5.  
CS> It frustrated me on several levels but number one was not knowing what my 
CS> shutter and aperture was without moving the camera from my eye.  (other 
CS> things that bothered me about this camera: no DOF preview (which the k1000 
CS> lacks but is not needed for a beginner; after all they should understand what 
CS> DOF is first before adding this convenience) and a max shutter speed of 1/2 
CS> (the k1000 has 1 sec which is fine)).

CS> Ok, the student should just be able to see relationship of aperture and 
CS> shutter-speed based on movements of the match needle exposure indicator, but 
CS> I feel that knowing the actual value is much more helpful to understand the 
CS> basics of photography.

CS> k1000 not a good "student" camera?  Heresy?  My opinion?  Give me an MX any 
CS> day over a K1000....

CS> Christian

Reply via email to