Actually, there is a way around this in P99SEsp6.

Create a DRC rule that specifically states that the clearance between any 
two objects of the footprint <company logo> is 0 mil.
Next, also create a DRC rule that says the minimum track width of the 
footprint <company logo> is 1 mil and you're all done.

Leo

At 12-5-2006 06:05, Nukien wrote:
>This is a nagging problem I haven't been able to get around yet, and I'm
>sure that someone else has run into the same thing ...  I have a couple of
>nice pcb logo footprints done that go on our boards, originally built from
>one of the bmp-2-pcb programs, then manually tweaked up.  They mainly
>consist of a bunch of TINY (1 and 2mil) tracks and arcs, some judicious use
>of small keepout tracks and a keepout border around the logo.  Looks pretty
>good.
>
>The problem is with Design Rule Check.  It always complains about the width
>and proximity of the tiny tracks that make up the logo.  There doesn't seem
>to be any way to assign them to a given net, so I could use a Design Rule
>for that specific net.  In the Library editor for a track, there's a
>pulldown for the net, but the only selection is "No Net" and I can't
>override it.
>
>In the PCB editor you can't get to the individual tracks of the logo - it's
>just the monolithic part.  I can partly get around it ...  Create a new net
>for the logo, then explode the component to primitives  Select all the
>connected copper and assign to the new net, and use that for a width rule.
>That works, but it still hangs up on clearance constraints.  Also, worse,
>the component is now gone, and next time an update it done, the synchronizer
>wants to put the logo component back on.
>
>I've tried creating pads for all the copper runs in the footprint.  Then use
>a schematic part with the right number of pins, and assign nets that way.
>That works - the pads have the right net, but all the tracks that make up
>the logo don't, and don't seem to want to take it.
>
>The goes with the "using top/bottom layer tracks for a footprint" problem
>I've heard and experienced ...
>
>
>--
>Dean Carpenter
>deano at areyes com
>94TT :)
>
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum
>
>To Post messages:
>mailto:[email protected]
>
>Unsubscribe and Other Options:
>http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com
>
>Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
>
>Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]



 
____________________________________________________________
You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum

To Post messages:
mailto:[email protected]

Unsubscribe and Other Options:
http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com

Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
 
Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current):
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]

Reply via email to