On 2006-12-27 11:50:17, you wrote: >> How about selecting a font that has clearly different symbols for what >> you want to distinguish? That's usually easy when using a computer, and >> usually transparent while writing... :)
> True, but that can be a subjective experience. Most fonts with unique > character sets (ie, easily resolvable differences in all characters) are > a slower read than fonts with less structure, at least for some such as > myself (I noticed several years ago that I found myself re-reading > sentences and paragraphs much more often than with documents presented > in Arial, and I still do). Interesting. I know this thing about font preferences, and every now and then I try some out to see if I like them better. Much more often than not I go back to what I had before :) OTOH, I don't think that e.g. your preferred Arial with some (quite minor) changes to make the problem characters more easily distinguishable would be more difficult to read. This font might be difficult to find, though... (I don't know how involved it would be to make those changes and create a derived font.) Gerhard ____________________________________________________________ You are subscribed to the PEDA discussion forum To Post messages: mailto:[email protected] Unsubscribe and Other Options: http://techservinc.com/mailman/listinfo/peda_techservinc.com Browse or Search Old Archives (2001-2004): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected] Browse or Search Current Archives (2004-Current): http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]
