Jerry, I am referencing the diagrams that Jeff attached to his last post, under the subject thread "Vol. 2 of CP, On Induction" and never meant to be saying anything theoretical about diagrams in general..
-- Franklin ------------------------------------ On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Jerry LR Chandler <jerry_lr_chand...@me.com > wrote: > Franklin: > > > > On Nov 14, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Franklin Ransom wrote: > > I understand that the diagrams are an attempt to show how rhemes are > incorporated into dicents, and then how dicents are incorporated into > arguments, and thus to show that just as a rheme can be nested in a dicent > by the filling in of its blank, so a dicent or set of dicents can be nested > in an argument and become part of it by filling in a blank of their own. > > > The concept of a diagram is far wider than what you allude to. > > See: > > - Greaves, M., 2002, *The Philosophical Status of Diagrams*, Stanford: > CSLI Publications. > > > This is an extraordinary book. Places CSP's diagrams is a modern and wider > a logical framework. > > Cheers > > Jerry >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
