Clark:
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 3:02 PM, Clark Goble <cl...@lextek.com> wrote: > > Peirce explicitly saw entropy and conservation as not applying universally > because they only applied to determinate systems. He also saw entropy as a > statistical measure. The question is whether his semiotics violates the laws > of thermodynamics and he explicitly saw that they did. The question then > becomes how contemporary understanding of thermodynamics in science would see > it. Most contemporary science sees thermodynamics as unbreakable. In that > case if the universe is getting more ordered that violates the second law of > thermodynamics. Given the historical development of the concepts of thermodynamics, I was surprised by these comments. Very curious about the citations and the years involved. Cheers Jerry
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
