On 6/12/2017 7:33 AM, kirst...@saunalahti.fi wrote:
It may well be that it is LOGICALLY impossible to prove.
That may be true. That may be like the existence of God. There are no proofs that God exists. There are no proofs that God does not exist. In fact, there are no two people -- believers or nonbelievers -- who will give you the same definition of God. Just ask them.
But I do think they are worth some attention.
I agree. A useful term is 'prescientific'. That is not the same as 'unscientific'. It just means that the methods of science are not applicable. Perhaps someday they might be. But nobody knows how. John
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
