It’s okay, Helmut.

Happy New Year everyone.

Wendy


> On 31 Dec 2017, at 18:23, Helmut Raulien <h.raul...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> Jon,
> Yes, Ive read that too: After the three wise men had left, an angel told Mary 
> and Joseph that Herod wants to kill the child, and they should flee to Egypt, 
> which they did. But the portray was "taken" in the barn, so they were not on 
> their way yet, so technically they were not refugees already, only the next 
> day or so. But maybe to portray them as refugees is justified with the 
> artist´s license to hop over this small time gap? I think, the pope did not 
> make the same mistake like me, but the journalist writing about the pope did. 
> Anyway, Wendy is right by saying they were not refugees when the portray was 
> "taken", and the sign becomes more complicated with this aspect of artist´s 
> license having to be included. Maybe it increases the number of required 
> pages to more than 20?
> Happy new year,
> Helmut
>  
> 31. Dezember 2017 um 18:32 Uhr
> Von: "Jon Alan Schmidt" <jonalanschm...@gmail.com>
>  
> Helmut, List:
>  
> There are two accounts of the Holy Family in the Bible.  Matthew includes the 
> flight to Egypt to escape Herod after the visit of the Magi, which is 
> presumably what the artist who portrayed them as refugees had in mind.  Luke 
> omits that particular episode.
>  
> FYI, www.biblegateway.com <http://www.biblegateway.com/> is a handy site for 
> looking up Bible passages, especially since it includes various English 
> versions and numerous other languages.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA
> Professional Engineer, Amateur Philosopher, Lutheran Layman
> www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt 
> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt> - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt 
> <http://twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt> 
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Helmut Raulien <h.raul...@gmx.de 
> <mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de>> wrote:
> Uh! Ive looked it up, and apologize. I am embarassed, why did I answer before 
> looking it up? Now I dont see the point in the nativity picture anymore, an 
> agree with Gary not to talk about it anymore. Sorry again, Wendy, happy new 
> year!
> Wendy,
> but Mary, knowing she was pregnant, could not know whether somebody she had 
> told this might have told it to Herodes´ spies? I dont know, maybe you are 
> right, I just have to trust somebody about this, and please forgive me, I (at 
> the time, hypothetically) rather trust the pope than you. I have not looked 
> the matter up in the bible, though.
> Best,
> Helmut
> 30. Dezember 2017 um 21:35 Uhr
> Von: "Wendy Wheeler" <wendy.j.whee...@btinternet.com 
> <mailto:wendy.j.whee...@btinternet.com>>
> Helmut,
>  
> The reason they travelled was as I’ve stated - as given in the gospel of 
> Luke. Had they stayed at home, there would have been no slaying of the first 
> born by Herod since the latter, according to Matthew, heard of the birth in 
> Bethlehem from the three wise men who came to witness it.
>  
> I’m not concerned with the Pope’s comparison.
>  
> Wendy
>  
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 30 Dec 2017, at 20:09, Helmut Raulien <h.raul...@gmx.de 
> <mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de>> wrote:
> Wendy,
> if they had stayed home, they would have had their first born slain. If this 
> does not make them refugees, discuss it with the pope, who also compared them 
> with the contemporary refugees.
> Best,
> Helmut
> 30. Dezember 2017 um 20:57 Uhr
> Von: "Wendy Wheeler" <wendy.j.whee...@btinternet.com 
> <mailto:wendy.j.whee...@btinternet.com>>
> Dear Helmut (and list),
>  
> I’ve come to this discussion both late and rather incompletely. I haven’t 
> read every contribution closely. Can I point out, though, and in case nobody 
> else has, that the Holy Family were not refugees. They were travelling to 
> Joseph’s birthplace in obedience to the requirements of the Roman census. 
> They returned home afterwards. The Trondheim Nativity scene under discussion 
> here thus looks like an iconic sign used to mislead.
>  
> Best wishes,
>  
> Wendy Wheeler
>  
> Sent from my iPhone
> ----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or 
> "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to 
> peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but 
> to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
> the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm 
> <http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm> .
> 
> -----------------------------
> PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
> PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu 
> . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu 
> with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
> http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
> 
> 
> 
> 

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to