JAS, List
> On Jul 5, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Jon Alan Schmidt <jonalanschm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> According as the number of blanks in a rheme is 0, 1, 2, 3, etc., it may be
> termed a medad (from {méden}, nothing), monad, dyad, triad, etc., rheme. (CP
> 2.272, EP 2:299; 1903)
>
> The first sentence requires at least one part of a Proposition to be erased
> in order to produce a Rheme; so a "medad Rheme" with zero blanks is really
> still a Proposition, since nothing has been erased from it.
“0” is “0”, not one.
In normal usage of language, the interpretation that an erasure is necessary to
generate a rhema (rheme ) is every rare.
This usage create a direct contradiction which appears unlikely for CSP.
Cheers
Jerry
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
