Dan E>  I just think that when we wind up quoting Peirce only
instead of
showing how the ideas work out practically, we are not proceeding
pragmatistically, as he would have.

I enthusiastically agree,
and I believe that Peirce would as well.   I am not using my primary
computer at the moment, and I can't search CP.  But anyone who can should
search for the point that he does not "reflect" in words, but in
diagrams.  As I recall, it's in CP 1.

For Peirce, words are
secondary, and diagrams are primary.  Since the MSS are all we have as the
starting points, we must begin with the words.  But to understand the
words, we must dig beneath the words to get to the diagrams -- including
the icons and hypoicons -- that formed and informed Peirce's
thought.

John
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to