>Brad,can you please read the rest of Steve's post, or the sentence that
>prior to the sentence you cite? since Steve is not here, I can not talk
>on behalf of him, but his work is an excellent piece in Marxian sociology.
>Steve wrote:
>
>>> Because of these sharp
>critiques, Wilson reinvented himself as an
> >> environmentalist concerned about bio-diversity.
If it is an excellent piece of Marxian sociology, why does it make
false claims about Wilson's intellectual development?
Either Steve does not know enough about E.O. Wilson to know that he
was always *both* a sociobiologist and an environmentalist--in which
I have better things to spend my time reading, things written by
people who have done their homework--or Steve knows that he is lying
when he claims that Wilson's environmentalism is an intellectual
re-make--in which case I have better things to spend my time reading,
things written by people who don't lie to me.
Brad DeLong
