In a message dated 00-04-09 00:04:25 EDT, you write: << the socio-biological claim that people differ because they differ genetically is called RACISM, >> No it's not. It would be racist (and genetically illiterate, for the most part) to say that some groups of people are inferior to another because of their genes, but it is not racist to say, for example, that Black people are different in the color of their skin from whites in large part because of their genes. That is just true. Genes are causally efficaous; they do account for some of the variation in differences between groups and individuals, and anyone who denies that has no idea what he is talking about. --jks
- Re: Re: genome news (fwd) md7148
- Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Mine Aysen Doyran
- Of Steve Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (f... Stephen E Philion
- RE: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Max B. Sawicky
- Re: genome news (fwd) Louis Proyect
- RE: Re: genome news (fwd) Max B. Sawicky
- Re: RE: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) md7148
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Mathew Forstater
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) md7148
- Re: genome news (fwd) Doyle Saylor
- RE: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) md7148
- RE: RE: Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Max B. Sawicky
- Re: genome news (fwd) md7148
- Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Rod Hay
- Re: Re: genome news (fwd) md7148
- Re: Re: Re: genome news (fwd) Michael Perelman