>I began by mentioning the need to control the rich. Brad suggested, if I >understood him correctly, that I might mean that I would like to see the >poor remain poor to minimize the impact of the rich. No. I said that one has to be very careful deploying that kind of argument because it does run the risk of sliding toward the position that the poor need to remain poor for ecological reasons--not that you had already slid to that position.
- Re: unreserved Michael Perelman
- Re: RE: RE:"We used 10 times as much energy in the 2... Eugene Coyle
- RE: Re: RE: RE:"We used 10 times as much energy... Mark Jones
- Re: RE: Re: RE: RE:"We used 10 times as muc... michael
- Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE:"We used 10 time... Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE:"We used... Michael Perelman
- RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE:&quo... Mark Jones
- My looniness Michael Perelman
- Re: My looniness Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: My looniness Michael Perelman
- RE: My looniness Brad De Long
- RE: My looniness Mark Jones
- Re: RE: My looniness Ken Hanly
- Re: My looniness Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: My looniness M A Jones
- Re: Re: RE: My looniness Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: RE: My looniness M A Jones
- Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: My looniness Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: My loonines... Doug Henwood
- RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: My loon... Mark Jones
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: My loon... Jim Devine