Michael Perelman wrote: > > Ian, Marx posited that capitalism would work that way for a while, but > that the contradictions would accumulate and then ...., but then, it has > not yet happened, except in the USSR, China ... > "If you don't hit it, it won't fall." Mao. I rather suspect that capitalism can be depended on periodically to tear itself apart -- but it can also be depended on to put itself back together unless there is a political force that can overthrow it in at least a few nations substantial enough to defend themselves. Unless we really do think that History (with the uppercase H) is some sort of divinity, we can't guarantee the appearance of such a force. We can work for it and see what happens. (Of course it can also destroy the environment irreparably. I don't see any guarantee against that either.) Carrol
- Re: reform and rev Rakesh Bhandari
- RE: reform and rev Max Sawicky
- Re: RE: reform and rev Rakesh Bhandari
- RE: reform and rev Forstater, Mathew
- Re: RE: reform and rev Rakesh Bhandari
- Re: reform and rev Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: reform and rev Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: reform and rev Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: reform and rev Ian Murray
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reform and... michael perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reform and rev Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reform and... Michael Perelman
- Re: If you don't hit it, it wo... Romain Kroes
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: reform... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: reform and rev Greg Schofield
- Re: Re: reform and rev Rakesh Bhandari
- Re: Re: Re: reform and rev michael perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: reform and rev Rakesh Bhandari
- Re: Re: reform and rev William S. Lear
- Re: Re: Re: reform and rev Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: RE: reform and rev Doug Henwood