> >And how could Marx define the "absolute general law of capitalist >accumulation" in the way he does in Ch XXV if his theory of value >was not >a) dynamic >b )systemic? > > > >Mine is not an overimaginative reading of the overall thrust of >Marx's approach, (although unimaginative readings of Marx's theory >are more than possible). > > >Chris Burford
Not at all Chris. I was suggesting that my definition was limited, in need of supplmentation because it did not capture the meanings on which you are rightly focused. Rakesh
