>9. Foreign policy issues are not important domestic politics. Why should
>they be important? We are free and independent nation. Marxists,
>particularly of anti-imperialist variety, don't appreciate that calling
>independent nations 'semi-colonies' and 'peripheries' is the worst possible
>insult.
>
>Ulhas

>From Sanjaya Baru's "Strategic Consequences of India's Economic
Performance" in Economic and Political Weekly, June 29, 2002 

Distribution of World Income: 1700-1995 

        1700    1820    1890    1952    1978    1995 
China   23.1    32.4    13.2    5.2     5.0     10.9 
India   22.6    15.7    11.0    3.8     3.4     4.6 
Japan   4.5     3.0     2.5     3.4     7.7     8.4 
Europe  23.3    26.6    40.3    29.7    27.9    23.8 
US      -       1.8     13.8    21.8    21.8    20.9 
Russia  3.2     4.8     6.3     9.3     9.2     2.2 

Source: Angus Maddison, Chinese Economic Performance in the Long Run, OECD,
Paris, 1998 


Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org

Reply via email to