yes, but also . . . another important caveat to doyle's strategy is that it can only possibly produce a left if we're putting demands he can't meet *that a mass of people actually think are reasonable*. thus the ice cream business.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:39 PM, Max B. Sawicky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can't promise this won't be second rate, but I'd rather put to BHO a list > of good stuff that I think he CAN do. > > There's always time to demand stuff that won't happen. > > > > > Doyle Saylor wrote: > >> Greetings Economists, >> I would say that serious lists are more important than some clap trap >> about ice cream. What is possible to seriously demand now? That would help >> set the agenda for the left to form around. I don't care if a list is not >> feasible. What I care about is making demands upon Obama that he can't meet >> under the present circumstances and if he can't accommodate then we have a >> left. >> >> I'm tired of second rate banter. >> thanks, >> Doyle Saylor >> On Nov 6, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Max Sawicky wrote: >> >> That's better than Carrol's list. >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> pen-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > pen-l mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l >
_______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
