Fuck dichotomizing between reformism and revolution. People have real needs. Some of those needs can be met more immediately by reforms. There are also some reforms that open up future possibilities for more profound changes.
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Doyle Saylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If things polarize down the road which is what you are talking about Carrol > that will define things further, but I can't tell reformism can be defeated. > We have to have further polarization leading out of this opportune time to > hope for something like you want. What I think is practical is establish a > left movement based upon failures we can define now, and I would not stop at > reform of the U.S. economy. I mean a left that is more than Obama style > promises of reform but a left that can define a more ambitious global > system. -- Sandwichman _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
