On Thursday, April 12, 2012 at 12:42:06 (-0500) Carrol Cox writes: >David Shemano. Haidt is trying to create a meta-analysis of certain >universal values . . . > > ------- > >And that is where he goes off the track. There is no such thing as a >"universal value," and any analysis grounded in that fallacy loses its >relevance to actuality. As I said, the word "righteous" cast serious doubt >on the book's interest.
To this, Noam Chomsky would certainly strongly disagree. Bill _______________________________________________ pen-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.csuchico.edu/mailman/listinfo/pen-l
