David E. Wheeler wrote: > On Feb 19, 2009, at 12:12 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote: > >>> I’m not talking about pass/fail, I’m talking about finding out >>> about subplans, from the consumer end. >> >> As TAP has no formal means to express that, and I'm not waiting for a TAP >> extension, any TAP reader will need extra logic to figure that out. So >> worrying about that seems moot. > > Should TAP be extended for this?
Yes. Sub-plans have been considered, but we never quite got something to work that was backwards compatible. Anyhow, I'm not waiting for it. -- emacs -- THAT'S NO EDITOR... IT'S AN OPERATING SYSTEM!
