* Michael G Schwern <schw...@pobox.com> [2009-02-19 21:15]: > As TAP has no formal means to express that, and I'm not waiting > for a TAP extension, any TAP reader will need extra logic to > figure that out. So worrying about that seems moot.
If it takes a lot longer and TB offers subplans in the meantime, people will want to be able to get the information back out of their TAP streams before formal subplans become part of the syntax. So worrying about how they will process the output of a stream containing implicit subplans seems entirely appropriate. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis // <http://plasmasturm.org/>
